Superior quality custom essays starting from $11.99/page:

  • Every paper written from scratch;
  • Creative and original writing;
  • Only native English speaking, professional writers work for us;
  • Guaranteed timely delivery;
  • An array of topics, disciplines, and deadlines;
  • Guarantee of 100% confidentiality.
Order Now Live Chat
Free EssaysEconomicsMicroeconomicsBuy an essay
Health Care Economics →

Buy custom Microeconomics essay

Economics has many aspects that, sometimes, are not seen in a brief view on them. Microeconomic theoreticians sometimes ignore economic realities. This paper will evaluate Ian Fletcher’s critique of the assumptions of the standard microeconomic model of free trade. Also, it will consider the author’s assumptions, evidence, theory, and method of argumentation. Moreover, about the paper will consider the real-world political and economic context for this issue as well as the full set of policy alternatives that nations actually have available to them.

First of all, it is needed to say that Ian Fretcher in his article “The Theory That’s Killing America’s Economy” tells his point of view regarding microeconomics and free trade. He critiques an idea of such a model stating that some analytics do not see a full picture of this issue. Giving examples of dubious assumptions, Fretcher tells why they are wrong regarding real-world economics. He clearly states that the sustainable trade could not be reached as it is not balanced because of many factors. We agree with this statement, because every country has its own limit of resources.

The second issue concerns externalities and prices of national products that may be higher or lower than a profitable unit. Fretcher mentions environmental damage due to the overconsumption of separate goods. We can state that regarding one or another region the problem may differ, but non-balanced trade can lead to bad results.

Speaking about productive resources, the author says that there is no positive thing in this kind of trade. Industries will kill each another as materials would be available in many regions and there would be no reason for the trade on another stage. Nevertheless, free trade of national resources can be efficient if every case would be researched and limited in export and import.

To sum up, Fretcher’s theory is quite clear and right. At the same time, analytics is true in some sense regarding perfect case of microeconomics.

Buy custom Microeconomics essay

Related essays

  1. Health Care Economics
  2. Importance of Trade Regulations and Trade Agreements
5.8K
1.7K

Hot Prices

Custom Paper Features

  • Approximately 250 words per page;
  • Font: 12 point Times New Roman;
  • Double spacing;
  • Desired citation style;
  • Free bibliography;
  • Free title page;
  • Free table of contents;
  • Free, unlimited revisions;
  • Fully accredited and referenced work;
  • We write on virtually any topic.

Current status / activity:

  • 950 professional writers
  • 97.9%% of orders delievered with the set time frames
  • 9 out of 10 average quality score

Testimonials:

#0969675: "For writer: Fast with the highest high quality; for the support team: rapid, nice services. Thank you, many times over!"
"Social Media Investigation" Marketing
2 days ago
#219245: "Fantastic! I am quite pleased with my results! Thank you for the perfectly written paper."
"Writer's choice" Education
6 days ago
#74672: "Thanks! BRAVO! The paper was perfect! I owe you guys! Thanks so much!”
"Tangiers Distribution Center" Logistics
8 days ago